Glossary entry (derived from question below)
German term or phrase:
rechtliche Gehör
English translation:
Right to be heard
German term
rechtliche Gehör
5 | Right to be heard | Kathrin.B |
4 +1 | He was denied due process of law | Shane London |
May 25, 2012 09:45: franglish changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"
PRO (3): Astrid Elke Witte, Steffen Walter, franglish
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Right to be heard
HTH
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 days (2004-09-26 16:12:10 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
Thankx. :-)
He was denied due process of law
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 8 mins (2004-09-19 14:53:09 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry. That should have been just \'due process of law\' as per previous posting.
agree |
gangels (X)
33 mins
|
Discussion