Mar 14, 2018 23:06
6 yrs ago
1 viewer *
German term

Datenschutzpranger

German to English Bus/Financial Law (general)
Hi guys,

I'm currently translating a text about data security in the workplace and this term has cropped up in the following context:

Ggf. Meldepflicht (Art. 33 GDPR, Öffentlicher Datenschutzpranger)

Any thoughts?

Thanks,

Gavin

Discussion

Lancashireman Mar 15, 2018:
Privacy policy This is very much an American term for 'data protection'. 'Privacy' has a much broader meaning in British/Irish English, e.g. overbearing extensions to neighbouring properties.
TonyTK Mar 15, 2018:
Hi Doc, All the hits for "Privacy Pillory" are really one and the same individual hit.
Plus, "Privacy Pillory" does sound a bit like the name of a porn star ...
TonyTK Mar 14, 2018:
You could probably just use ... ... "public naming and shaming" - which googles quite well in combination with the GDPR - as the rest is presumably clear from the context.

Proposed translations

+1
1 hr
Selected

data protection offenders' list

By analogy with the sex offenders' list (more formally 'register'). 'Pranger' seems to be slightly journalese anyway.
Peer comment(s):

agree Wendy Streitparth : Why not?
10 hrs
Thanks, Wendy. Look what TonyTK wrote as an addendum!
neutral TonyTK : This sounds a bit specific, Andrew. I'm not sure there's an actual "list" (although there might well be ...). // Q: What do you say when you're comforting a grammar nazi? A: There, Their, They're.
11 hrs
Don't be so literal, Tony. At least it's a noun for a noun, unlike your gerunds. // You might like to favour us with your verdict on 'violators of privacy'. It's top of the chart at the moment on +4 while this is looking mediocre on CL3 + 1 neutral.
neutral AllegroTrans : I cannot see any mention of a list in Article 33 of the GDPR
1 day 15 hrs
Your version falls short on two counts: 1) it omits the 'Pranger' (= pillory) element, and 2) 'breach' is the opposite of '-schutz'.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thanks guys"
18 hrs

Violators of privacy

Given the context and GDPR, how about violators or attackers of privacy?

In the link below, Google, Facebook etc. could be called the major violators of privacy.
Peer comment(s):

neutral AllegroTrans : "Privacy" is not the same concept as data protection
21 hrs
neutral TonyTK : "Violator" sounds very active, I think this is about inadequate protection and the naming of the provider in question.
1 day 15 hrs
Something went wrong...
1 day 16 hrs

Personal data breach

The GDPR is an EU regulation, readily available in English. This appears to be the title:


Article 33
EU GDPR
"Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority"

=> Article: 4
=> Recital: 75, 85, 87, 88
=> administrative fine: Art. 83 (4) lit a
=> Dossier: Personal Data Breach
1. In the case of a personal data breach, the controller shall without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, notify the personal data breach to the supervisory authority competent in accordance with Article 55, unless the personal data breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. Where the notification to the supervisory authority is not made within 72 hours, it shall be accompanied by reasons for the delay.
=> Article: 39, 83
=> Recital: 75
=> Dossier: Reporting to supervisory authority, Obligation, Risk For Rights And Freedoms
2. The processor shall notify the controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a personal data breach.
=> Dossier: Processing On Behalf (Processor)
3. The notification referred to in paragraph 1 shall at least:
(a) describe the nature of the personal data breach including where possible, the categories and approximate number of data subjects concerned and the categories and approximate number of personal data records concerned;
(b) communicate the name and contact details of the data protection officer or other contact point where more information can be obtained;
=> Dossier: Data Protection Officer
(c) describe the likely consequences of the personal data breach;
(d) describe the measures taken or proposed to be taken by the controller to address the personal data breach, including, where appropriate, measures to mitigate its possible adverse effects.
4. Where, and in so far as, it is not possible to provide the information at the same time, the information may be provided in phases without undue further delay.
5. The controller shall document any personal data breaches, comprising the facts relating to the personal data breach, its effects and the remedial action taken. That documentation shall enable the supervisory authority to verify compliance with this Article.
Peer comment(s):

neutral TonyTK : While that's all true, the "-pranger" refers specifically to the public naming of the provider who allowed a data breach to occur. IMO it's more of an image thing. // It's in the discussion box (and googles well) ...
17 hrs
Would appreciate seeing yr own suggestion
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search